In a decision issued yesterday in The Atlanta Opera, Inc., the Board returned to the 2014 FedEx Home Delivery (FedEx II) standard for determining independent contractor status under the National Labor Relations Act (the Act) and overruled SuperShuttle (2019). In applying the FedEx II standard, the Board found that the makeup artists, wig artists, and hairstylists who work at the Atlanta Opera—had filed an election petition with the Board seeking union representation—are not independent contractors, excluded from the Act, but rather are covered, employees.
In its decision, the Board reaffirmed longstanding principles—consistent with the instructions of the Supreme Court—and explained that a list of common-law factors will guide its independent contractor analysis. The Board expressly rejected the holding of the SuperShuttle Board that entrepreneurial opportunity for gain or loss should be the “animating principle” of the independent contractor test.
The Board further explained that entrepreneurial opportunity would be taken into account, along with the traditional common-law factors, by asking whether the evidence tends to show that a supposed independent contractor is, in fact, rendering services as part of an independent business.
In reviewing the facts of this case and applying the FedEx II standard in Atlanta Opera, the Board determined that the majority of the traditional common-law factors point toward employee status. The Board also determined that the evidence did not show that the stylists rendered services as part of their own independent businesses.
“In today’s decision, the Board returns to the independent contractor test articulated in FedEx II and reaffirms the Board’s commitment to the core common-law principles that the Supreme Court has determined should guide the Board’s consideration of questions involving employee status,” said Chairman Lauren McFerran. “Applying this clear standard will ensure that workers who seek to organize or exercise their rights under the National Labor Relations Act are not improperly excluded from its protections.”
In December 2021, the Board invited parties and amici to submit briefs addressing whether the Board should reconsider its standard for determining workers’ independent contractor status.
Members Wilcox and Prouty joined Chairman McFerran in issuing the decision. Member Kaplan dissented from the overruling of SuperShuttle but concurred in finding that the stylists were employees, not independent contractors.
This could open the door for future organizing, especially for companies like Uber, Lyft, and DoorDash that rely heavily on independent contractors to supply their services. Employers who work with independent contractors should keep an eye on this. The Board will be releasing further rules on this matter in the next couple of months.
